Koozebanian Fazoob Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I would think having your name on a list of the best players in the US would be worth a bit, at least. I guess that doesn't mean much to some people though. You don't have to have everyone in the same place at once, but you'd eventually have to have everyone play everyone else, and that would be pretty difficult if you've got half of your best on the EC and the other half on the WC. The problem is that there's just no money involved, and fighting game players are, as a rule, poor as fuck.
Manta Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I really don't think we should put a tier list in this thread as it is, if this thread is for beginners, posting such a list would just mean everyone new to this site suddenly becomes eddie/slayer lamers.
Manta Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I really don't think we should put a tier list in this thread as it is, if this thread is for beginners, posting such a list would just mean everyone new to this site suddenly becomes eddie/slayer lamers.
Koozebanian Fazoob Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 I agree, I'm not going to put them in there.
Koozebanian Fazoob Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 I agree, I'm not going to put them in there.
CrimsonDisaster Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 I would think having your name on a list of the best players in the US would be worth a bit, at least. I guess that doesn't mean much to some people though. You don't have to have everyone in the same place at once, but you'd eventually have to have everyone play everyone else, and that would be pretty difficult if you've got half of your best on the EC and the other half on the WC. The problem is that there's just no money involved, and fighting game players are, as a rule, poor as fuck. You could do the scrub favorite and get the CPU to do all the matches.
CrimsonDisaster Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 I would think having your name on a list of the best players in the US would be worth a bit, at least. I guess that doesn't mean much to some people though. You don't have to have everyone in the same place at once, but you'd eventually have to have everyone play everyone else, and that would be pretty difficult if you've got half of your best on the EC and the other half on the WC. The problem is that there's just no money involved, and fighting game players are, as a rule, poor as fuck. You could do the scrub favorite and get the CPU to do all the matches.
Kairi Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 Hmm I had no idea there was a new ranking,I think the new one should be put in there especially since I finally have proff that jam is ranked higher than slayer millia too...don't say thats not proff...quite...I need this...
Kairi Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 Hmm I had no idea there was a new ranking,I think the new one should be put in there especially since I finally have proff that jam is ranked higher than slayer millia too...don't say thats not proff...quite...I need this...
poon Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 That's not a tier ranking, it's a result from a series of matches with specific players.
poon Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 That's not a tier ranking, it's a result from a series of matches with specific players.
Kairi Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 That were thrown together to determine the final reload rankings
Kairi Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 That were thrown together to determine the final reload rankings
Manta Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Does it matter? The differences between one rank and the ones next to it are negligable, which is a good thing. I think this topic has completely digressed, how about someone just deletes the last few posts, including this one, so we can get back to answering newb questions.
Manta Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Does it matter? The differences between one rank and the ones next to it are negligable, which is a good thing. I think this topic has completely digressed, how about someone just deletes the last few posts, including this one, so we can get back to answering newb questions.
Kairi Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 Tier rank's matter im playing slayer!!....you don't know what it's like anilhating people and having them saying slayer is too good...when there using higher ranked characters..I need this..
Kairi Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 Tier rank's matter im playing slayer!!....you don't know what it's like anilhating people and having them saying slayer is too good...when there using higher ranked characters..I need this..
Manta Posted December 18, 2005 Posted December 18, 2005 You need this? It only proves your mates' point, Slayer is right up there in the rankings. EDIT: Can anyone tell me the exact mechanics of a weapon clash, as in, the causes and all of the effects. I know it shortens the recovery time on the moves that clashed, but I don't know which moves get affected more than others.
Manta Posted December 18, 2005 Posted December 18, 2005 You need this? It only proves your mates' point, Slayer is right up there in the rankings. EDIT: Can anyone tell me the exact mechanics of a weapon clash, as in, the causes and all of the effects. I know it shortens the recovery time on the moves that clashed, but I don't know which moves get affected more than others.
Koozebanian Fazoob Posted December 18, 2005 Posted December 18, 2005 Any time two hit-boxes colide but neither colide with any hittable-boxes, you get a clash (assuming both are physical hits capable of clashing). It lets you cancel the move into anything else (Need to FD to block though). It doesn't change the properties of the moves otherwise.
Koozebanian Fazoob Posted December 18, 2005 Posted December 18, 2005 Any time two hit-boxes colide but neither colide with any hittable-boxes, you get a clash (assuming both are physical hits capable of clashing). It lets you cancel the move into anything else (Need to FD to block though). It doesn't change the properties of the moves otherwise.
Manta Posted December 18, 2005 Posted December 18, 2005 Has the move itself considered to have used a hit then upon clash? E.g. if Potemkin does j.D and clashes but doesn't cancel, will he still do damage if he lands on his opponent?
Manta Posted December 18, 2005 Posted December 18, 2005 Has the move itself considered to have used a hit then upon clash? E.g. if Potemkin does j.D and clashes but doesn't cancel, will he still do damage if he lands on his opponent?
Koozebanian Fazoob Posted December 18, 2005 Posted December 18, 2005 Yeah the clash counts as the hit, so j.D wont just go through and hit on the next frame (wow that would be nice). Only way it could is if you had a move that hit multiple times (Anji's j.214P is a good example).
Koozebanian Fazoob Posted December 18, 2005 Posted December 18, 2005 Yeah the clash counts as the hit, so j.D wont just go through and hit on the next frame (wow that would be nice). Only way it could is if you had a move that hit multiple times (Anji's j.214P is a good example).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now