Kiba Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 Just a heads up. I made a new changes thread because there's more information that's missing from Orion's post but I want everyone to be able to see it rather than dig for it. I understand Nick is busy so I decided to create a new video thread which I can update.
Dreize Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 3 CP video threads and 2 CP changelog threads, hopefully forum-goer's wont get confused. Also, I really liked the idea of having the 1st post in the new video thread dedicated to notable player matches.
Kiba Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 Yea honestly that's was one reason I was hesistant on making new threads. Looks like clutter atm Regarding the video thread, thanks, glad you like it.
bakahyl Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 So i have to watch out for Valkenhayn's overhead attacks more than his low in CP? Because his wolf 5a is no longer a low (but has now a slower low attack in wolf form) and valkenhayn has a 2nd high attack in wolf form?
Kiba Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 (edited) So i have to watch out for Valkenhayn's overhead attacks more than his low in CP? Because his wolf 5a is no longer a low (but has now a slower low attack in wolf form) and valkenhayn has a 2nd high attack in wolf form? As a standard, you can worry less about Valkenhayn's lows and blocking Valk's mixup is somewhat easier because of the lack of lows. This is the short answer. This is the long answer however. Despite w[5A] not being a low anymore Valkenhayn can still find ways to hit you with a low. He could do w[5A] > 6DD > 2B, or more commonly, he could use w[5A] > 2D/3D > w[5C]. The point of the dash is to trick you into thinking that he will go high. w[5C] is also is a good confirm to hit with too as it goes into about 3.6k. The 2nd high in wolf form that you're referring to is w[j.C], which again, is a really strong confirm. So you can worry more about overheads, but you have to worry about the mixup as a whole since despite the lows, he still has the command grab, and human interchange mixups. Edited March 3, 2013 by Kiba
Dreize Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Might as well add on a little bit to what Kiba had said, there is definitely more to consider; but here is the gist of it: Midscreen, you should almost always be blocking low against human mode (unless he's in the air obviously). Even if he does hit you with 6C he can't actually get a combo off of it unless he's in or close to the corner, plus it's rather slow so you should be able to block it on reaction a good amount of the time. However, new to CP, he can actually cancel 5C, 3C, and 2C into geschwind wolf, 5C being the most useful one in my opinion. Corner, you should be blocking low against human mode for a good amount of the time. However, there are definitely exceptions to this case. If he has 50 meter, watch out for j.C > RC > j.C fuzzy set-ups, and his 6C plays a more prevalent role in the corner as well. Also, watch out for 5B > Jump Cancel > j.D oriented set-ups. 2A > 5D > w[236C] set-ups are also relatively ambiguous. Midscreen and the Corner both work relatively the same with wolf mode, and you'll have to do some guessing. Even though he lost his fast 6 frame low that chains into itself 3 times, he still has many ways to open you up with lows. You'll always have to be weary of his command grab. Here are 2 basic CP exclusive blockstrings off of the top of my head: w[5A > 5B > 5C > 6D > j.A > j.C] or w[5A > 5B > 5C > 6D > j.A > Land > 5C] w[5A x N > 5C] or w[5A x N > 6D > j.C] In short, yes, you'll have to worry less about wolf mode lows. But be weary of his w[5C] and w[j.C], as they are both great normals that lead into solid damage.
Kiba Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Ah I assumed Bakahyl was specifically referring to wolf mixup. Nevertheless it does help to gain insight on Valk's mixup overall.
hipikachu Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 2A > 5D > w[236C] set-ups are also relatively ambiguous. w[236C]
Dreize Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 w[236C] The new input for our wolf exclusive command grab.
hipikachu Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Wouldn't 2A > 5D > w[236C] leave you with an aerial grab though? Doesn't seem too ambiguous to me.
Dreize Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Valkenhayn's human 2A is wolf cancellable. Thus, 2A > 5D > 236C is possible. In no way, shape, or form is Valkenhayn ever in the air during this string. It's kinda like a tick throw set-up, but it shouldn't turn pink if done properly.
hipikachu Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 (edited) Oh right, I was thinking about special-canceling wolf mode. My bad. EDIT: I don't even think it CAN pink. Startup time for the command grab shouldn't overlap with the blockstun from 2A Edited March 3, 2013 by hipikachu
Kiba Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 You are correct. You will never get a pink throw from that setup.
Dreize Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Yes, that's why I stated that it's only "kinda" like a tick throw set-up.
itsme Posted April 20, 2013 Posted April 20, 2013 How fast exactly is Valk's w[5C>CA] instant overhead?
Shyn Posted April 20, 2013 Posted April 20, 2013 (edited) If performed perfectly, 15f. 2C>CA is faster at 13f, if performed perfectly, but I'm not sure how possible that is since the stick needs to return to neutral in 3f for that to work. (Or rather I'm pretty sure this is how it is. Please correct me if I'm wrong.) Edited April 20, 2013 by Shyn
Sahgren Posted April 20, 2013 Posted April 20, 2013 w[1/2/3C~5c > j.A] is definitely possible; it even looks a bit smoother animation wise. It's just that 2 extra frames off of something that's more or less impossible to react to in the first place doesn't go all that far in justifying the jump in execution.
itsme Posted April 20, 2013 Posted April 20, 2013 (edited) Oh neat, thanks. I actually thought it would be faster than the rising jC instant overhead (11f start up + 4f jump start up). EDIT: Wait, so is the human rising jC 14 frame start up or 15 frame start up? I'm not sure if the jC comes out right at the 4f mark or right after the 4f mark. Edited April 20, 2013 by itsme
Recommended Posts