MrDolphin Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 now you may have heard of how OP doctor's doom's foot dive in UMVC is, but this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoH96OLrrHk&feature=related OTG relaunch combo? DON'T FUCKING THINK SO, FOOT DIVE FROM THE GROUND. Jesus I'm surprised that woman was still conscious.
sweetvids Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 so many changes in mechanics. This is some sweet ass shit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGwl3EaVk-w Must not play though. Must study for test tomorrow.
BagLunch Posted March 22, 2012 Posted March 22, 2012 Watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=467pmIX-oZo Then read this: http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/076/0/8/marauder_shields__meet_shepard__s_last_foe__me3__by_koobismo-d4t2v53.jpg http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/076/f/9/marauder_shields_1__the_paragon_effect__me3__by_koobismo-d4t2xet.jpg http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/076/a/9/marauder_shields_2__the_mass_dilemma__me3__by_koobismo-d4t2y0u.jpg http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/076/a/c/marauder_shields_3__the_intervention__me3__by_koobismo-d4t2yke.jpg http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/077/e/6/marauder_shields_4__the_dna_fiasco__me3__by_koobismo-d4t5gby.jpg http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/077/1/5/marauder_shields_5__the_importance_of_london__me3__by_koobismo-d4t7eeb.jpg http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/078/3/a/marauder_shields_6__the_true_catalyst__me3__by_koobismo-d4tamm9.jpg http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/079/e/f/marauder_shields_7__the_cost_of_survival__me3__by_koobismo-d4tevtd.jpg http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/080/d/3/marauder_shields_8__the_beacon_of_hope__me3__by_koobismo-d4ti3nw.jpg
Saru Kada Posted March 22, 2012 Posted March 22, 2012 haha wow MARAUDER SHIELDS the depth of fan response to ME3 has really been something else
ghostgoodboy Posted March 22, 2012 Posted March 22, 2012 bought my ME3 copy for 35$ and just sold it for 35$, good bye marauder fucking shields.
Coren Posted March 23, 2012 Posted March 23, 2012 Ranbat cancelled because Stronghold is too busy with card games, my cup runneth over with sadness. Saturday is totally a shitty day to host things there.
ghostgoodboy Posted March 25, 2012 Posted March 25, 2012 glad you came. hmm, I wasn't so glad that the condom broke when I came last night.
sweetvids Posted March 25, 2012 Posted March 25, 2012 Haha you serious Ray? Better get out the coat hanger
Shiro420 Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 just leaving this in here http://www.edmontongamers.com/absolutevictory.htm
ghostgoodboy Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) edit: pg18 Edited April 1, 2012 by ghostgoodboy
sweetvids Posted March 30, 2012 Posted March 30, 2012 Damn this nig is good. http://soundcloud.com/madeon/martin-solveig-the-night-out
ghostgoodboy Posted March 30, 2012 Posted March 30, 2012 (edited) not bad, pumps just enough gas for gay morning shifts. would love this nigga to do a remix on Tonight Is The Night. Edited March 30, 2012 by ghostgoodboy
BagLunch Posted March 31, 2012 Posted March 31, 2012 BEST EVER http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rznYifPHxDg
BagLunch Posted April 1, 2012 Posted April 1, 2012 So a question I posed a long time ago to some people here was this: The word "ate" is interesting, because under string rotation it is always a valid English word. You can get "tea", "eat", and then "ate". A number of onomatopoeia words do, but they tend to just become other onomatopoeia words, e.g. "OH" and "HO", "AH" and "HA", and the same goes for words that are all the same character, like "MM", "AA", "OO". Two words that have this property that are not onomatopoeia nor acronyms are "ON" and "NO". How many other words have this property of being always a valid word under string rotation? And do these word sets also exist in other languages (well, not counting ideograph-based written languages, since the basic written unit is a whole entire word)? I just thought of this again, because I was helping some undergrads with arrays and strings.
ghostgoodboy Posted April 1, 2012 Posted April 1, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJTXLuu7_0Y wow just wow. how the hell did the camera man just record it without any comments seeing something out of the movie. i would've been so salty and pulled that bitch out of the car and teach her a lesson. that shit is so imbalanced that it's like Lv5 dark wesker. there's nothing you can do, especially against a car with your body.
Zieg Posted April 1, 2012 Posted April 1, 2012 http://blog.tastebuds.fm/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/worstalbumcovers06.jpeg So a question I posed a long time ago to some people here was this: The word "ate" is interesting, because under string rotation it is always a valid English word. You can get "tea", "eat", and then "ate". A number of onomatopoeia words do, but they tend to just become other onomatopoeia words, e.g. "OH" and "HO", "AH" and "HA", and the same goes for words that are all the same character, like "MM", "AA", "OO". Two words that have this property that are not onomatopoeia nor acronyms are "ON" and "NO". How many other words have this property of being always a valid word under string rotation? And do these word sets also exist in other languages (well, not counting ideograph-based written languages, since the basic written unit is a whole entire word)? I just thought of this again, because I was helping some undergrads with arrays and strings. Anagrams; just google them. allergy, gallery, largely, regally < this shit, yes?
BagLunch Posted April 1, 2012 Posted April 1, 2012 http://blog.tastebuds.fm/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/worstalbumcovers06.jpeg Anagrams; just google them. allergy, gallery, largely, regally < this shit, yes? Nope, an anagram is quite different from what I'm talking about. For instance, when rotating the word "take", the only possible strings are: take aket keta etak take Some possible anagrams/unique orderings of "take" are: tkae atke aetk ekat aekt atek Now, those anagrams aren't actually English words, but you can see how it's not possible to get those arrangements just by rotation. If you were to take the word "regally", there's no way to rotate it such that you can get "gallery", even though "gallery" is an anagram of "regally": regally egallyr gallyre allyreg llyrega lyregal lyregall yregall regally
BagLunch Posted April 1, 2012 Posted April 1, 2012 guys, I got my girls pregnant, FUCK. wait wait wait did you just say GIRLS, plural cuz if you mean that oh man
MashThat5A Posted April 1, 2012 Posted April 1, 2012 So a question I posed a long time ago to some people here was this: The word "ate" is interesting, because under string rotation it is always a valid English word. You can get "tea", "eat", and then "ate". A number of onomatopoeia words do, but they tend to just become other onomatopoeia words, e.g. "OH" and "HO", "AH" and "HA", and the same goes for words that are all the same character, like "MM", "AA", "OO". Two words that have this property that are not onomatopoeia nor acronyms are "ON" and "NO". How many other words have this property of being always a valid word under string rotation? And do these word sets also exist in other languages (well, not counting ideograph-based written languages, since the basic written unit is a whole entire word)? I just thought of this again, because I was helping some undergrads with arrays and strings. SPA, PAS, ASP
sweetvids Posted April 1, 2012 Posted April 1, 2012 Nah Gabe, it's April 1st. He even said they on dat pill.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now