Remiri

I only get practice against tager and hakumen tbh, my matchup experience is crapbaskets. I usually just expect to lose and if I don't well then...thats a pleasant surprise! Never disappointed that way :p edit: Not to say I dont have confidence in my ability, I just simply don't have the time to go out and play at arcades(they dont exist!) or attempt to find a scene that is actually active and frequent.

On the 1st post of this thread it states that previous loketest changes are still in effect unless otherwise mentioned.

This thread is not the place to be speculating on tiers or stuff of that nature. The thread is more discussing the changes occurring in this location test of an unreleased game. imo mods should clean up the shit or this thread is going to get locked soon, and we will be called faggots, etc.

Holy crap I just saw this thanks to a friend. rofl I look forward to losing to your noel in December

can't...resist...responding to troll-fu. Please explain how 'getting buffs' suddenly means a unanimous designation of 'A-Tier' for location tests of a game not released yet.

goddamnit stop quoting him im accidentally reading more of what he is posting.

Stopped reading here. unanimous based on what now? Tetsu is not exactly just 'some guy', he is pretty much the best jin player out there. Maybe if some nameless scrub was in a 40 win-streak it would be cause for concern.

And here I went from people not having experience versus CS jin. BAH! From the look of things Jin and Tager will be traditional scrub fare come CS2

I would like to sign up for BBCS and rep my totally free Jin. Remiri-CT Thanks!

That will most likely be the window for 5C > 5D > oki situations. I would assume 5C > 5D > D ice car/Touga will still be possible.

I am guessing with the sekkajin changes that hitting with that 2nd hit of 5B will be less necessary, also with 3C OTG combos being techable will eliminate the need to be extremely close in order to do any viable combo. In fact a ton of changes will help with this, like B musou returning. You could get away with defaulting a 1-hit B to C, or letting it go when you are absolutely sure you are close enough.

Yo dawg im not seeing any .5s there, arcadia must fail at math and matchup charts.

Is there honestly something more captivating about the bbcs matchups that CAN be discussed here? This thread is showing its age, nothing left to do but bicker about stupid shit.

Would have responded quicker but I had to make a sale :p You seem to think I don't understand math, this is false. My statement is based on attempting to use the process of gathering data, and then subsequently assigning either a percentage or a ratio to that data. This does not work when the majority of the decision is not on solid data. A number with a decimal is more PRECISE, not accurate. For example, I am thinking of a number out of 100. This number is 50. Two people guess the number. One person guesses 49, the other guesses 48.5. The person who said 48.5 was giving a more precise response, but it was less accurate than the 1st. Precision: Mathematics . the degree to which the correctness of a quantity is expressed. Accuracy: Mathematics . the degree of correctness of a quantity, expression, etc.

You seem to be having trouble discerning the difference between opinion and data-gathering. The above quote can be taken seriously if the matchup chart was based on actual gathered data for 100 matches between each character. If this is not the case, then unfortunately your patronizing attitude leads you nowhere. EDIT: you may also wish to explore the difference between accuracy and precision prior to insulting someones intelligence so directly.

Glad I could be of service. But srsly no one is sitting there running 100 matches for these opinion-based charts, so claiming that a .5 value makes it more accurate sounds like contrived bullshit to me. EDIT: also the basis of my post was in response to the matchup chart being based on rounds, so that being erroneous sorta puts my previous points in a moot status.

Did we not just confirm that these charts are not based on statistics? Also there is no inflammatory notion in my post, so cool your jets.

.5 matchup lists make 0 sense to me, perhaps I am retard but... A basic match is best of 3, and a basic matchup chart goes by matches i.e 6-4 to denote out of 10 matches one will win 6/10. If we were to take the matchup chart to go by rounds alone, that would be 30 potential rounds so a 6-4 turns into a 18-12. 6.5-3.5 would then be what 19.5-10.5? Since it is best of 3 there is a possibility for a 2-0 win which fucks the ratio of a 'matchup chart', and you also can't have half a round it just doesn't make sense. Any way you slice it, a Matchup Chart should be based on matches, and a match is all inclusive of the number of rounds used thus being the best representation. IMO. EDIT: changed my numbers due to terrible math skills.

True champs play best of 5 just look at WCG LOLOLOL

.5 tier lists are shit anyways. brb winning half a match

Heads vs Tails is 60-40. real talk

skill ranges vary when a ton of players are about 2hours and 30minutes away from the nearest arcade with bbcs. AT LEAST

Genesic Emerald Tullamore Blaster?

How would you just throw those numbers in? Its 2 numbers in a single instance, or are you going to come up with a differential equation for the BBCS matchup chart. haha

I would highly recommend considering different nomenclature for this. No one in this thread should say that a 60-40 ragna vs ragna makes sense, it fucking doesn't. I AGREE WITH THE CONCEPT, but call it something else ffs. I may be new to posting here, but this is either retarded or an attempt to troll.