A.X.I.S. Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 you're complaining how your main's matchup should be worse... no. tager vs tao is a fucking joke, last i remember, tager has to guess his ass out of a lot of shit because tao can drive cancel a lot of her normals. its not complaining its more or less finding out why it is what it is.
dehumanizer Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 oi how is tager vs tao 4.5? i'm questioning this whole chart! -scrubbing it for life- last i checked tao can dance around and 6C tager for free. u questioning the ara matchup? cant wait till it comes to consoles so i can see what a fair matchup against u would be.
A.X.I.S. Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 u questioning the ara matchup? cant wait till it comes to consoles so i can see what a fair matchup against u would be. have you not heard? AxisTheBeast is 80% free! shout outs to those CT carls. considering XBL ara's are scared of me they may say its 7-3...i believe its even in CS though for fair reasons.
ZONG_one Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 have you not heard? AxisTheBeast is 80% free! shout outs to those CT carls.
ZONG_one Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 can you all shut up jesus christ Any insight on Tager match ups?
smooshman Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 can someone explain the Jin vs Bang matchup? sure Bang has an advantage but 6.5:3.5?
Henaki Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Any insight on Tager match ups? be a way better player and you'll always win, unlike ct where you might win. maybe. for the record i hate the idea of scientific matchup chart. some peoples playstyles are naturally suited for fighting different characters, and really you can argue the semantics of .5 points all day. shit is just too free, good, hella good, even, bad, hella bad, or practically unwinnable. i prefer the idea of a 1-7 matchup chart if this kinda stuff needs numbers.
tolore Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 It's best to use as a guide line. 5.5 and 6.0 are bad but not too terrible, 6.5 and 7 are really bad, anything past that borders on unwinnable.
Circuitous Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 9-1 borders on unwinnable. 10-0 is unwinnable. That's why one guy has no wins.
Spirit Juice Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Yeah, 10-0 means it's pretty much impossible to lose. An example (although exaggerated) would be Juda vs Jagi... which everyone jokes as being a 9.9-0.1 match up. Poor Jagi.
ZONG_one Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Yeah, 10-0 means it's pretty much impossible to lose. An example (although exaggerated) would be Juda vs Jagi... which everyone jokes as being a 9.9-0.1 match up. Poor Jagi. Lol, I need to learn HnK.
Master Bigode Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Yeah, 10-0 means it's pretty much impossible to lose. An example (although exaggerated) would be Juda vs Jagi... which everyone jokes as being a 9.9-0.1 match up. Poor Jagi. lol, what makes this match up so terrible ?
Dacidbro Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 be a way better player and you'll always win, unlike ct where you might win. maybe. for the record i hate the idea of scientific matchup chart. some peoples playstyles are naturally suited for fighting different characters, and really you can argue the semantics of .5 points all day. shit is just too free, good, hella good, even, bad, hella bad, or practically unwinnable. i prefer the idea of a 1-7 matchup chart if this kinda stuff needs numbers. I dunno, maybe you don't play many tournaments, but the tiers of characters is always seen. Maybe not with pure consistency, but once you get to a reaaaaally good crowd the tiers show up. So no, being a better player doesn't always mean you'll always win, not at all. Not even in CS. And if you don't like the concept of this thread, get the fuck out. Lol. Kind of simple. All you've done so far is tell the on topic people to stop being on topic or to shut the fuck up. Kind of annoying.
A.X.I.S. Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 can someone explain the Jin vs Bang matchup? sure Bang has an advantage but 6.5:3.5? bang is the new jin and jin is the new bang...get it?
DoomieJ Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 bang is the new jin and jin is the new bang...get it? So bang has a 5:5 against the top tier in this game? what? Your logic is deniable.
Spirit Juice Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 I dunno, maybe you don't play many tournaments, but the tiers of characters is always seen. Maybe not with pure consistency, but once you get to a reaaaaally good crowd the tiers show up. So no, being a better player doesn't always mean you'll always win, not at all. Not even in CS. Not true. There are a lot of 6-4/4-6 match ups in CS. While it may be considered a good/bad match up, the better player will generally come out on top if the level of play is high enough. A good example of this would be JP GGAC, where the level of play is so high that a 6-4/4-6 match up is generally negligible. There is only one match up in that game where the difference in the match up is very noticable (Eddie vs Pot, which is 6.5-3.6 or 7-3). In CS, there's only a few match ups like that.
smooshman Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 bang is the new jin and jin is the new bang...get it? except bette- his match ups are bett-chchchch than Jin's ever were... I just can't say it, it hurts to much
Henaki Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 I dunno, maybe you don't play many tournaments, ell oh fucking ell
Prototype909 Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Anyone care to explain the new Ragna/Jin matchup? In CT it's pretty much Jin in the air > everything Ragna does
smooshman Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Anyone care to explain the new Ragna/Jin matchup? In CT it's pretty much Jin in the air > everything Ragna does I think's it's because Ragna's damage> than Jin's damage... and jin's damage isn't good enough to kill Ragna fast enough... so Ragna's greatest weakness (lol level health) is lessened.... I would have thought 5-5 just for story sake...
A.X.I.S. Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 erhem.... after playing a real rachel in CT i have this to say: fuck you rachel, fuck your holiday friends, enjoy your tea time in CS, that is all thank you.
Recommended Posts