Jump to content
Dustloop Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

Relius vs Haku a 4-6. Man I want to smoke what those players are on to give Relius a 4 in that matchup. He deserves a 3 :/

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Relius vs Haku a 4-6. Man I want to smoke what those players are on to give Relius a 4 in that matchup. He deserves a 3 :/
On a related note, I think that Tager/Valk deserves a 3-7. Easily.
Posted

Okay. Serious impressions to further some speculative conversation:

Makoto is not that bad

Ragna is not that good

Tager vs Hazama 5.5 made me wat

For real though, only qualms are Ragna and Makoto.

Posted
Where the fuck are the mirror matches?

Why isn't it in timeline format?

They're still trying to figure out which mirrors are even matchups and which are 7-3.

Posted
They're still trying to figure out which mirrors are even matchups and which are 7-3.

Legitimate point. In some mirror matches, you have to save IBs for when you need them.

Posted
Okay. Serious impressions to further some speculative conversation:

Makoto is not that bad

Ragna is not that good

Tager vs Hazama 5.5 made me wat

For real though, only qualms are Ragna and Makoto.

How is Ragna not that good? He has good damage where it counts (Everywhere) and he doesn't afraid of anything.

Omni must be laughing out loud at the Makoto match ups.

Posted
I get a tingly feeling whenever I see a match-up chart.

Oh hay Tsubaki isn't dead last as a matter of fact... it doesn't seem like her match-ups changed much from CS2...

:toot:

realtalk

no one in jp plays tsubaki

and her chart is full of 5.0s

40 50 50 45 50 50 50 50 45 50 45 50 X 45 45 50 50 50 50 (-35)

posts without fully understood match-ups just became 5.0

sooooooooooo

Posted
How is Ragna not that good? He has good damage where it counts (Everywhere) and he doesn't afraid of anything.

Omni must be laughing out loud at the Makoto match ups.

Sure his damage is great. But it's Ragna. Forever high mid
Posted
How is Ragna not that good?

rushdown with okay mixup and okay oki = okay character

that simple

Posted

from what I've seen on jbbs the consensus is that tsubaki and makoto are dead last.. the only argument is which is worse and if they're bad enough to be in their own tier. Whatever.

Posted

Without splitting hairs, I can pretty much accept what they have for Bang's at least (from what I've seen watching a ton of matches only). There was nothing that really stood out like "wtf why do they have that".

Although I might switch what they have for Vs. Hakumen and Vs. Taokaka, but that'd be me being picky.

Posted
It's funny how they nerf any character that wins a major, Did Tsubaki need nerfs?

She was mid-tier as hell with some solid stuff but nothing really exceptional (barring maybe 5b, which she needed, and 236D)

aka

fuck no

Posted

Most of the time a character gets a big and blatent nerfbat, it's because they know something we don't.

Which is to be expected, seeing as they actually make the game.

Posted
realtalk

no one in jp plays tsubaki

and her chart is full of 5.0s

sooooooooooo

Just in case though I would hope you caught on to it, my initial response was full of sarcasm.

Posted
Most of the time a character gets a big and blatent nerfbat, it's because they know something we don't.

Which is to be expected, seeing as they actually make the game.

Man, it takes a lot to trust the devs so blindly.

Or is it that hard to accept they're human, and can make some seriously bad mistakes in balancing?

Just in case though I would hope you caught on to it, my initial response was full of sarcasm.

sarcasm

on my internets

lies

Posted

Ragna is taking CS2 Makoto place, its already confirmed by bunch of big players like Buppa :v:

The poor people in EX for sure are Tsubaki and Makoto, I highly doubt that Tsubaki is just -3.5. They call it the Tsubakoto Tier :psyduck: Not sure if Tager should join them or not.

Noel tier is taken from a stupid QQ chart on the JBBS, so don't count on it too much lol

Posted
Most of the time a character gets a big and blatent nerfbat, it's because they know something we don't.

Which is to be expected, seeing as they actually make the game.

Usually when they get a big and blatant nerfbat, it's because they're at the very top of the game? Of course I don't think S tier this game, D tier next game is great design, personally..

Posted
Man, it takes a lot to trust the devs so blindly.

Or is it that hard to accept they're human, and can make some seriously bad mistakes in balancing?

Not sure what you're so venomous about. BB balance has been, overall, incredibly fair.

They've earned my trust, I didn't just decide to bequeath it to them.

Usually when they get a big and blatant nerfbat, it's because they're at the very top of the game? Of course I don't think S tier this game, D tier next game is great design, personally..

*out of the blue* I forgot to include.

Look at the Abel changelogs in SF for example, everyone thought he was completely fair, then he got it bad. And then they explained why and everyone was like: Ooooooo....

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
×
×
  • Create New...