killionaire Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 YES, quite a bit. Thanks.. I was wondering if my logic had any backing to it.
bbq sauce Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 you are terminally ill. sad to say it is hard to cure the disease of being born without a functioning ability to comprehend reason or critically think. well there is one cure, it's called your 5th birthday. p sure my son who is 4 would understand the concepts in this thread better than most people, if I were to explain it to him.
Remiri Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 skill ranges vary when a ton of players are about 2hours and 30minutes away from the nearest arcade with bbcs. AT LEAST
Henaki Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 p sure my son who is 4 would understand the concepts in this thread better than most people, if I were to explain it to him. look man im trying to be generous here. i know some people can be a bit slow.
killionaire Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 So, yeah. Considering that we don't have a large enough sample size in that level to reliably rely on statistics, the point stands.
Black Onslaught Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 so basically if you don't post in the jersey thread then you don't know shit
huey253 Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 So, yeah. Considering that we don't have a large enough sample size in that level to reliably rely on statistics, the point stands. its true, and i agree, it totally couldn't be done in the US with Stats... taokaka would be low tier and tager would be high tier. lol
Amadeus46Art Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 The only mirror match we can all agree on being terrible is Tsubaki. Why? Well... ...is it even really a fight?
The Noble Clap Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 yes. if you aren't from nyc/nj or named zong (who is basically ec) you don't have a valid opinion. truth. I approve of this message. Being from nyc/nj also gives INSTANT shit talking privileges.
farranpoison Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 Heads vs Tails is 60-40. real talk 55-45 would be closer to actual truth.
Remiri Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 .5 tier lists are shit anyways. brb winning half a match
Varamathras Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 Everyone who posts in this thread is retarded. Even me.
The Noble Clap Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 .5 tier lists are shit anyways. brb winning half a match lol. I may not be up to date with all the newfangled street lingo, but in my day, half a match is called a round,. Unless if there wer- Holy Shit .33 matchup chart!
Remiri Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 lol. I may not be up to date with all the newfangled street lingo, but in my day, half a match is called a round,. Unless if there wer- Holy Shit .33 matchup chart! True champs play best of 5 just look at WCG LOLOLOL
SansProtocol Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 This thread makes me think Blade's a mentally average Dustloop Forum member.
KayEff Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 That's what you get when you pile a concept very open to concepts and opinions with DL. Actual miserable little piles of secrets.
Aureliano Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 lol. I may not be up to date with all the newfangled street lingo, but in my day, half a match is called a round,. Unless if there wer- Holy Shit .33 matchup chart! Those numbers in matchup charts don't represent matches though, they represent rounds. Actually I always wondered how they took into account carry-over resources like bursts or meter in some games. They probably ignore them.
Lord Orx Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 I came to this thread after reading about it on the Jersey thread. Honestly, I came here to see if there was any trolling I could do to support the cause. I regret my decision. This thread is a trap that trolls you once you read any part of it. I have lost a bit of hope for humanity this day, and the grand total of hope I had was already in the negative. Stay freer than a runaway slave, DL.
KayEff Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 Runaway slaves weren't free... Unless that's what you were trying to insinuate.
farranpoison Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 Those numbers in matchup charts don't represent matches though, they represent rounds. Actually I always wondered how they took into account carry-over resources like bursts or meter in some games. They probably ignore them. In other games the numbers represent the odds that a certain character will win in a matchup. Here, I'm not too sure anymore.
Remiri Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 (edited) Those numbers in matchup charts don't represent matches though, they represent rounds. Actually I always wondered how they took into account carry-over resources like bursts or meter in some games. They probably ignore them. .5 matchup lists make 0 sense to me, perhaps I am retard but... A basic match is best of 3, and a basic matchup chart goes by matches i.e 6-4 to denote out of 10 matches one will win 6/10. If we were to take the matchup chart to go by rounds alone, that would be 30 potential rounds so a 6-4 turns into a 18-12. 6.5-3.5 would then be what 19.5-10.5? Since it is best of 3 there is a possibility for a 2-0 win which fucks the ratio of a 'matchup chart', and you also can't have half a round it just doesn't make sense. Any way you slice it, a Matchup Chart should be based on matches, and a match is all inclusive of the number of rounds used thus being the best representation. IMO. EDIT: changed my numbers due to terrible math skills. Edited November 5, 2010 by Remiri
Klaige Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 Jesus christ, can you people not read a few pages back. .5's are not meant to determine someone can win "half" a match more or less. It's because the theory of the matchup number is of that over 100 matches. I.E. a 6.5/3.5 matchup means one character wins 65 out of a 100 matches. A bigger sample size is always better for any kind of statistical chart. Thus the .5 numbers ARE MORE ACCURATE. Is it that fucking hard to figure out?!
Remiri Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 Did we not just confirm that these charts are not based on statistics? Also there is no inflammatory notion in my post, so cool your jets.
KayEff Posted November 5, 2010 Posted November 5, 2010 why are you trying to make DL figure anything out someone posted about mirror matches being 6-4, that enough should tell you something
Recommended Posts